alcoholic-koolaid:

fem-mew-nist:

faineemae:

flyingmintbunny0:

asexualveganmystic:

dorkinthefreakkingdom:

faineemae:

if i had a dollar…

If I had a brick

sorry if I’m off topic but I’m so sick of people characterizing violent crime as “musta been mental illness” it throws us mentally ill people under the bus by perpetuating the stereotype that we’re dangerous

cant we just say there was something going on with that one guy?

ur totally right, many men don’t react violently when faced with rejection.
it was only this one guy.












Societus Patriarchus: the latin name for the so-called “mental illness” that’s always attributed to guys who become violent when they don’t get what they want


This is for the men that have to suffer the ignorance and sexist generalizations of feminism…

These are not ‘sexist generalizations.’ These are fully supported cases of men murdering woman for rejecting their advances, which have happened more than once and everywhere around the world. These are not cases of ‘mental illness.’ 
These are instances that have happened more than once; this is not one instance where a stereotype is being based singularly. 


What is ignorant about this? There are no ‘generalizations’ here. This is a repeating trend of situations that can lead to a logical conclusion that there are a good number of men who cannot handle rejection, and feel the need to murder the woman who rejected him. This is not generalizing all men as murderers and killers, only stating that there are men out there that would do this. 


Instead of feeling victimized by feminism, recognize that there are causes for this issue to arise and make an effort to help stop these instances from happening.

alcoholic-koolaid:

fem-mew-nist:

faineemae:

flyingmintbunny0:

asexualveganmystic:

dorkinthefreakkingdom:

faineemae:

if i had a dollar…

If I had a brick

sorry if I’m off topic but I’m so sick of people characterizing violent crime as “musta been mental illness” it throws us mentally ill people under the bus by perpetuating the stereotype that we’re dangerous

cant we just say there was something going on with that one guy?

ur totally right, many men don’t react violently when faced with rejection.

it was only this one guy.


Societus Patriarchus: the latin name for the so-called “mental illness” that’s always attributed to guys who become violent when they don’t get what they want

This is for the men that have to suffer the ignorance and sexist generalizations of feminism…

These are not ‘sexist generalizations.’ These are fully supported cases of men murdering woman for rejecting their advances, which have happened more than once and everywhere around the world. These are not cases of ‘mental illness.’ These are instances that have happened more than once; this is not one instance where a stereotype is being based singularly. What is ignorant about this? There are no ‘generalizations’ here. This is a repeating trend of situations that can lead to a logical conclusion that there are a good number of men who cannot handle rejection, and feel the need to murder the woman who rejected him. This is not generalizing all men as murderers and killers, only stating that there are men out there that would do this. Instead of feeling victimized by feminism, recognize that there are causes for this issue to arise and make an effort to help stop these instances from happening.



lilablackbird:

takemetothedungeons:

First official look at Steve Rogers and Thor in Age of Ultron.

#this picture has more beef than a burger joint

lilablackbird:

takemetothedungeons:

First official look at Steve Rogers and Thor in Age of Ultron.

(via scahill42)


lady-darkstreak:

unclewhisky:

thorkizilla:

Avengers Assemble 1x17 - Savages [x]

I WAS ALL SET TO BE MAD THAT THEY WERE MAKING THOR A BIG, DESTRUCTIVE, DUMB IDIOT.

BUT NO.

HE’S JUST AN OBNOXIOUS DICK WHO THINKS IT’S FUNNY TO CALL LIGHTNING IN THROUGH THE WINDOW TO MAKE POPCORN AND TOTALLY WRECK ALL OF TONY’S SHIT.

AND THE HULK SUGGESTING THINGS TO DO NEXT.  I LOST MY FUCKING SHIT AND I’M NOT SURE I’M EVER GETTING IT BACK NOW.

WHAT A COUPLE OF ASSHOLES.  I LOVE THEM SO MUCH.

The Avengers are always the most fun when they’re acting like a dysfunctional trailer trash family that just happens to have superpowers and goes and saves the world now and then.

dysfunctional trailer trash avengers are my kind of people

(via notenuf)


thatonenerdybroad:

eddietg:

If you own a dog, please share.

Even if you don’t own a dog, please share

thatonenerdybroad:

eddietg:

If you own a dog, please share.

Even if you don’t own a dog, please share

(via adam-rikard)


me during the summer: is today wednesday or sunday

mr-cappadocia:

thespectacularspider-girl:

abendlichter:

mr-gay-aka-johnny-boy:

cerebralzero:

kontractions:

Yep.

This

This is not at all what it’s about you disrespectful cunts you spit in the face of all the people murdered in recent massacres by this the argument is not to fully ban guns but to add more regulations and update current ones to offer more protection to the communities of the country from those who do own guns and happen to want to murder people most importantly by increasing physiological testing for fun ownership and not allowing military grade weapons to be sold that doesn’t mean all weapons will be banned and that no one will be able to get a gun it means more control on who gets a weapon and if they should own a weapon or not and why

what the fuck none of these arguments even make sense how would gun control be used to disarm slaves who weren’t legally allowed to own anything anyway what the fuck

I really don’t get why people in America own like… assault rifles and stuff.  Pistols?  Okay, I can at least understand why for self defense.  Shotguns?  Okay, maybe for hunting.  Hunting rifles?  Okay.
But some of the shit I’ve seen Americans own really freaks me out.  Like, why would you need those?  To defend your home in case the government attacks you?
Because, news flash, if you need a fucking military weapon for self defense, the people you’re defending against will surely have bigger guns with longer range.

You think small arms are useless in a revolution? I.e. assault rifles and so forth?Around 12 years ago tge most powerful nation in the history of mankind with a military budget ten times greater then the next ten nations combined decided to invade a backwater third world nation called Afghanistan. Sure… America occupied Afghanistan (which we only did because of the trillion dollars in rare earth elements buried there waiting to be mined) but the funny thing is… even though America is still there. .. so are the fucking taliban. And by all accounts were now seeing the formation of a new Muslim state.What did the poor backwater refugees from a bad madman ripoff have to defend themselves from the world’s most powerful military?  No tanks. No airplanes. No advanced military technology. Just small arms and improvised explosives.So the argument that firearms don’t protect against government tyranny is a false one.Finally.. and this is most important.  It’s a psychological deterrent. Let’s imagine you’re a king or queen. If you know with certainty that your people are incapable of fighting back on any level are you more or less likely to engage in acts of cruelty? Are you more or less likely to deprive them of rights?Historically speaking… we know the answer.

mr-cappadocia:

thespectacularspider-girl:

abendlichter:

mr-gay-aka-johnny-boy:

cerebralzero:

kontractions:

Yep.

This

This is not at all what it’s about you disrespectful cunts you spit in the face of all the people murdered in recent massacres by this the argument is not to fully ban guns but to add more regulations and update current ones to offer more protection to the communities of the country from those who do own guns and happen to want to murder people most importantly by increasing physiological testing for fun ownership and not allowing military grade weapons to be sold that doesn’t mean all weapons will be banned and that no one will be able to get a gun it means more control on who gets a weapon and if they should own a weapon or not and why

what the fuck none of these arguments even make sense how would gun control be used to disarm slaves who weren’t legally allowed to own anything anyway what the fuck

I really don’t get why people in America own like… assault rifles and stuff.  Pistols?  Okay, I can at least understand why for self defense.  Shotguns?  Okay, maybe for hunting.  Hunting rifles?  Okay.

But some of the shit I’ve seen Americans own really freaks me out.  Like, why would you need those?  To defend your home in case the government attacks you?

Because, news flash, if you need a fucking military weapon for self defense, the people you’re defending against will surely have bigger guns with longer range.

You think small arms are useless in a revolution? I.e. assault rifles and so forth?

Around 12 years ago tge most powerful nation in the history of mankind with a military budget ten times greater then the next ten nations combined decided to invade a backwater third world nation called Afghanistan.

Sure… America occupied Afghanistan (which we only did because of the trillion dollars in rare earth elements buried there waiting to be mined) but the funny thing is… even though America is still there. .. so are the fucking taliban. And by all accounts were now seeing the formation of a new Muslim state.

What did the poor backwater refugees from a bad madman ripoff have to defend themselves from the world’s most powerful military?

No tanks. No airplanes. No advanced military technology. Just small arms and improvised explosives.

So the argument that firearms don’t protect against government tyranny is a false one.

Finally.. and this is most important. It’s a psychological deterrent. Let’s imagine you’re a king or queen. If you know with certainty that your people are incapable of fighting back on any level are you more or less likely to engage in acts of cruelty? Are you more or less likely to deprive them of rights?

Historically speaking… we know the answer.


(via floraeu)


shutub:

squidinthesky:

All of my friends are fun, talented, cutie-patooties, and I’m just here like

image

WHAT DO YOU MEAN NOT TALENTED THT WAS THE MOST MAJESTIC THING IVE EVER SEEN

(via weiner-shitzel)


aizea:

"I hope that when the world comes to an end, I can breathe a sigh of relief because there will be so much to look forward to."
Donnie Darko (2001)
Dir. Richard Kelly

aizea:

"I hope that when the world comes to an end, I can breathe a sigh of relief because there will be so much to look forward to."

Donnie Darko (2001)

Dir. Richard Kelly

(via weiner-shitzel)